farseer2
Registered User
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2006
- Messages
- 1,309
How many originally credited to Jules were really by or mostly by his son?
I intended to talk in more detail about that once I get to the posthumous novels, but in short, Michel Verne had a hand in all of then. The modifications he made are important enough that I think it's fair to call them collaborations between Jules and his son Michel.
Michel was actually a decent writer, because he had everyone fooled. The eight posthumous novels were published with Jules Verne's name only, and for almost a century people thought they were 100% his. However, near the end of the 20th century, scholars found the archives of the Hetzel publishing house, with all the Verne manuscripts. Therefore, for those eight posthumous novels, they could see what Jules Verne had originally written and the modifications Michel had made when making them ready for publication after his father's death.
The first posthumous novel (The Lighthouse at the End of the World), had only slight modifications by Michel Verne, and the published version and Jules Verne's manuscript are very similar. All the others have more important modifications by Michel, who normally added characters or plot incidents, and sometimes changed the ending.
There is one posthumous novel (The Thompson Travel Agency) which scholars believe may have been written entirely by Michel, because a Jules Verne manuscript has not been found. So we can't know for sure (maybe there was a manuscript and it has been lost), but the working hypothesis is that Michel wrote that one from scratch.
There's also the last posthumous novel (The Barsac Mission) where Jules Verne only wrote the first five chapters, and Michel wrote the rest, although he integrated into the plot another posthumous short story that Jules Verne had written. In any case, that novel is more Michel than Jules.
The others were written completely by Jules, but Michel made significant modifications.
The original versions of those novels, as Jules Verne wrote them, have also been published, so people can read both and compare if they want. Opinions among Verne fans are divided regarding Michel's modifications:
Some people think that Michel's modifications are an artistic betrayal, more so in the case of The Golden Volcano, where the ending was changed. Jules' original ending was bitter and nothing good came out of the gold fever (Verne's novels often have little sympathy for greed), while Michel changed it to a more conventional happy ending and the heroes do not return empty-handed.
Others think that Michel came along at the right moment, as those posthumous manuscripts were lacking in action and not up to Jules' usual standards, and Michel's changes made the plots more entertaining and adventurous. One also has to remember that Jules' posthumous manuscripts had not been submitted for publication yet, so Jules might have edited or modified them himself if he had lived (he also made modifications sometimes following suggestions from his editor).
I care more about entertaining stories than about artistic integrity, so I'll be reading and reviewing the versions modified by Michel, which are the ones that were published as part of the Extraordinary Voyages series.
As a reminder, these are the eight posthumous Voyages:
(55) Le Phare du bout du monde (The Lighthouse at the End of the World, 1905) 41K words
(56) Le Volcan d’or (The Golden Volcano, 1906) (2 volumes) 115K words
(57) L’Agence Thompson and Co (The Thompson Travel Agency, 1907) (2 volumes) 126K words
(58) La Chasse au météore (The Chase of the Golden Meteor, 1908) 59K words
(59) Le Pilote du Danube (The Danube Pilot, 1908) 60K words
(60) Les Naufragés du "Jonathan" (The Survivors of the "Jonathan", 1909) (2 volumes) 142K words
(61) Le Secret de Wilhelm Storitz (The Secret of Wilhelm Storitz, 1910) 54K words
(62) L’Étonnante Aventure de la mission Barsac (The Barsac Mission, 1919) (2 volumes) 122K words
Last edited:


