Dune versus Dune by Byron Merritt
Page 1 of 4 I enjoyed talking with my grandfather on many occasions prior to
his death and, not surprisingly, our conversations often strayed into the realm
of his greatest creation - Dune - and its marketing to the general
public. There were many times when Grandpa laughed about this, because he saw
Dune as something unique and far removed from the marketable world.
Later he began to realize Dune wasn't just unique but was a parable of human
life that would endure thanks to the very things the book preached against. The
making of the 1984 movie (directed by David Lynch) seemed the epitome of one of
Dune's no-no messages [that of creating a cult following of one man
or his vision - Editor]. So if you chuckle a few times while reading this,
rest assured that Frank Herbert would probably be laughing right along with
you.
Humble Beginnings?
"They'll probably want to retitle it How to Repair Your Ornithopter."
That was Grandpa's first impression when Chilton Books - previously only a
publisher of how-to books - decided to market Dune in 1963. Being a
relatively new author at this point in his life, Frank Herbert simply wanted to
get his work published and out to readers. Hell, he probably would have let
them title it Dude, Where's My Sandworm? if it got the book into the
hands of the literary world. Thank God that didn't happen. Dune
became popular and so did Grandpa thanks to what was actually in the
book (Is that a Maker on the cover, or are you just happy to see
me?).
There are many Dune fans that would undoubtedly like to
know what Frank Herbert would think of the new miniseries (broadcast in late
2000 by the Sci Fi Channel) versus the Lynch movie. I can't tell you for
certain - but I can give a few insights into what I know of this complex human
being that was my grandfather, and how
he might have perceived the two films.
"You don't create a world
of dirt and wind without getting a little sand in your eyes." That's what he
told me one day when I asked Grandpa how Dune could possibly get
translated onto the movie screen. Much of what he told me can be read in a book
entitled (ironically enough) Eye, which is a collection of short stories
by Frank Herbert. You can bet that I cracked a smile when I saw that title,
then opened it up and read his introduction. Perhaps he was trying to tell me
it's the overly-analytical 'eye' that can destroy a work of literary art when
it gets moved to film. In Eye he mentions what he did and didn't like
about the making of the Lynch movie (he enjoyed the Italian Renaissance feel
but didn't care for the brutal slimming down of characters and
plot).
From these comments we can obviously surmise that Grandpa wanted
more for the fans; more characters, more focus on water, more development of
plots and more bronco riding o
f a worm with Paul yippin' and yee-hawin'! Well . . . maybe not that much
more.
There is the 3-4 hour Allen Smithee version floating around in
the VHS and Laserdisk worlds [Note: "Allen Smithee" is the pseudonym used by
a director who wishes to disassociate himself from a particular film -
Editor]. But if you're looking for more coherency than the shorter original
theatrical release, I don't think looking there will give you much
satisfaction. For the sake of simplicity, I'll stick to comparisons of the
original 1984 release and the 2000 miniseries.
So without further ado,
let's jump into the films and wade through the erg together. I hope you brought
your stillsuit! Next Page Copyright© 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Byron Merritt, sffworld.com. All rights reserved. No part of this may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the author.
|